ABSTRACT
Objective: Is to find out which revascularization methods have less of risk factors and complications after the surgery and long-term period. Method(s): From January 2018 to December 2019 were operated 134 patients with LAD CTO. 48 of them underwent MIDCAB: 36 (75%) males and 12 (25%) females;aged 58.7 +/-8.7;7 (14.6%) with previous diabetes;10 (20.8%) with previous PCI of LAD with drug-eluting stent. In the PCI group there were 86 patients: 52 (60.5%) males and 34 (39.5%) females;aged 64.8 +/-8.3;23 (26.7%) with previous diabetes. Result(s): Hospital mortality was 0 (0%) in MIDCAB unlike 1 (1.2%) in PCI. Myocardial infarction was 0 (0%) in both the groups. In MIDCAB the number of conversions to onpump and sternotomy was 0 (0%), there were 6 (12.5%) pleuritis with pleural puncture and 3 (6.2%) with long wound-aches. The hospitalization period was 10.7+/-2.9 days for MIDCAB and 9.9 +/-3.9 days for PCI. In the PCI group 2.0 +/-1.0 drug-eluting stents were used. In-hospital costs were higher for PCI 3809 unlike 3258 for MIDCAB. After one year in MIDCAB group died 2 (4.2%) patients, from noncardiac causes. In PCI group died 3 (3.5%) patients, all from cardiac causes. Because of pandemic COVID-19 were checked only 48 patients by angiography and general clinical examination: 25 after MIDCAB and 23 after PCI. 5 patients have a graft failure, caused by surgical mistakes. 4 patients have stents restenosis and 1 has LAD's reocclusion. Conclusion(s): Both methods of revascularization for LAD CTO are demonstrated similar results. EuroSCORE II (P = 0.008) and glomerular filtrating rate (P = 0.004) are significant potential risk factors for mortality in both groups, age is potential risk factor for graft failure (P = 0.05). Dyslipidemia is significant risk factor for LAD restenosis in PCI group (P = 0.02). MIDCAB is associated with lower incidence of revascularization repeat and in-hospital mortality in the literature data and it costs lower than PCI for LAD CTO as our study has shown.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a large burden on our global medical systems, particularly in patients that would require emergency surgery. Method(s): This single centre study determined the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent emergency surgery before and during the COVID-19 pandemic after using a propensity score matching analysis. Result(s): A decrease in the number of emergency surgeries performed during the pandemic was noted at 47.9%. Data showed that severe complications arose more frequently during the pandemic (pvalue<0.05). Furthermore, it arose more frequently in patients who had a concomitant COVID-19 infection. Age was directly proportional to the likelihood of developing of severe postoperative complications (pvalue<0.05). Undergoing cancer surgery and being classified as ASA IV increased the likelihood of developing severe postoperative complications (pvalue<0.05). Preoperative time was a significant factor for patients who underwent trauma and can- cer surgery during the pandemic since it was noted to be directly proportional to the likelihood of developing severe postoperative complications (pvalue<0.05). The mortality rate was significantly pronounced during the pandemic for patients who underwent benign and trauma surgeries (pvalue<0.05). Conclusion(s): Severe complications arose more frequently during the pandemic. Undergoing cancer surgery and being classified as ASA IV increased the likelihood of developing of severe postoperative complications. Age and Preoperative time were noted to be directly proportional to the development of severe postoperative complications particularly in trauma and cancer surgeries. The mortality rate was significantly more pronounced during the pandemic for patients who underwent benign and trauma surgeries especially with longer preoperative time.
ABSTRACT
With the adjustment of China's epidemic prevention and control guidelines regarding coronavirus disease of 2019(COVID-19), the preoperative evaluation and timing of surgery for patients after COVID-19 infection have become the focus of attention for both healthcare workers and patients. Based on the latest study and related clinical experience, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) has therefore compiled this multidisciplinary, evidence-based recommendation for concise, individualized, and practical preoperative evaluation and timing of surgery for patients after COVID-19 infection. The recommendations emphasize patients' COVID-19 infection history, the severity of symptoms, and medical/physiologic recovery status during preoperative evaluation. The determination of appropriate length of time between recovery from COVID-19 and surgery/procedure should take into account of patients' underlying health conditions, the severity of the COVID-19 infection course, and the types of surgery and anesthesia scheduled, to minimize postoperative complications. The recommendations are intended to aid healthcare workers in evaluating these patients, scheduling them for the optimal timing of surgery, and optimizing perioperative management and postoperative recovery.Copyright © 2023, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: The effects of COVID-19 on surgical practice are extensive and include modifications to perioperative practice and ways of working, workforce and staffing difficulties, procedural prioritization, intraoperative viral transmission risk, and surgical training and education. There is a lack of information about the way this pandemic has impacted medical professionals because of surgical practice. Aims and Objectives: The current study's goal was to determine the dispersion of COVID 19 through patients to healthcare professionals utilising PPE during emergency surgeries. Material(s) and Method(s): The study was conducted as a hospital based retro prospective observational study at the Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College and hospital of central India. After receiving institutional ethical committee permission and the informed written consent, 36 patients receiving emergency surgeries during COVID-19 Era and 109 health care professionals involved in patient care were evaluated for the onset of any COVID 19 symptom for 5 days postoperatively. All the data collected were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 26. Result(s): Among these 36 emergency surgeries patients, 86.1% (n=31) had COVID positive report during admission, mostly had complain of respiratory symptoms. Out of 16 COVID positive health workers, 81.25% (n=13) suffered from respiratory symptoms, 43.75% (n=7) had G.I symptoms and 12.50% (n=2) were asymptomatic. Analysis showed a positive relation between COVID positive status and depression in health care professionals (p=0.028). Out of 93 COVID negative health care workers involved in emergency surgeries, 90.32 % (n=84) were asymptomatic. Only 9.67% (n=9) health care workers had respiratory symptoms and 2.1% (n=2) had gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion(s): The current study may aid in the development of mitigation measures to enhance mental well-being, as well as the identification of factors of poor mental state and therapies to treat people suffering from a mental condition. Postoperative assessments in a digital environment on an individual basis allow team members to voice their worries and comments to the system as a mitigating technique. Evidence-based training and education for HCWs on pandemic preparation has been shown to be critical for improving hospital staff expertise, abilities, and mental well-being during a pandemic.Copyright © 2023, Dr. Yashwant Research Labs Pvt. Ltd.. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: More than 200 patients have benefited from lung transplantation who failed to recover from COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress (ARDS) with conventional ventilatory support and/ or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ECMO) in USA. We aim to share our experience and lessons learned at our institute through this case series. Method(s): After IRB approval, we performed a retrospective chart review and identified 37 patients who received ECMO for COVID-19 induced ARDS between May 2020 through January 2022. Out of these, 12 received a formal consultation from the transplant team. We studied patient characteristics, interventions during ECMO support, and evaluation outcomes. Result(s): Most of our patients had single organ failure i.e., lung, except for two who required dialysis after ECMO initiation. Six out of the 12 patients received bilateral lung transplant. One patient received the transplant before ECMO initiation. However, the patient required two runs of ECMO after the transplant due to postop complications from suspected COVID19 reinfection and deceased on postoperative day 101. All the patients after transplant had an expedited recovery except one who required prolonged hospitalization before starting physical therapy. The median length of hospital stay for the transplant group was 148 (89- 194) days and for the non-transplant group was 114 (58-178) days. The 30-day survival rate was 100% for the transplant group. At a median follow-up of 207 (0- 456) days after discharge, 5(83.3%) patients in the transplant group and 3(50%) patients in the nontransplant group were alive. In the non-transplant group, 4 patients received ECMO support for more than 75 days and at last follow-up 2 were alive and functioning well without needing new lungs. This asks for an objective prospective study to define the timeline of irreversibility of the lung injury. Conclusion(s): Lung transplantation is a viable salvage option in patients with COVI-19 induced irreversible lung injury. However, the irreversibility of the lung injury and the timing of lung transplant remains to be determined case-by-case. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Aim: While recent evidence describes atypical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in elderly patients, the frequency of delirium and associated outcomes in elderly patients with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) infection undergoing emergency surgery are not well defined. This study aims to determine the effect of COVID-19 on postoperative delirium and postoperative death in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. Material(s) and Method(s): This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in general surgery, orthopedics, and cardiovascular surgery clinics of a public hospital, including 30 days of follow-up between April 1 and May 1, 2021. All patients who were admitted to these clinics for emergency surgery intervention on these dates constituted the study population, while a total of 140 patients aged >=65 years, who met the study criteria, formed the sample of the study. Descriptive Characteristics Form and Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) were used as data collection tools in the study. SPSS 25.0 statistical program was used for data analysis. Result(s): Thirty (42.85%) of the SARS-CoV-2 positive (n=70) patients developed delirium in the study. 12.9% (n=18) of the patients died within 30 days of follow-up after surgery. There were 30 (69.8) of 70 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients who developed delirium, and 12 patients (25.5) died after testing positive for COVID-19, with a mean of 8.08T1.56 days within 30 days of admission. Discussion(s): These findings may lead to a poor clinical prognosis for COVID-19 infection delirium and postoperative death in patients over 65 years of age undergoing emergency surgery.Copyright © 2023, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The geriatric population is a growing subset of surgical patients. Specialized surgical risk management is important since physiologic changes are only loosely associated with age. Searching for better risk assessment tools, we come across the 5-point FRAIL scale, a validated measure of weakness and physiologic malfunction resulting to vulnerability to stressors like surgery. Method(s): Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of FRAIL scale in predicting 30-day complications in geriatric surgical patients. We conducted this research at a tertiary hospital in the Philippines from June 2020 to June 2021. Patients were classified preoperatively as frail or robust, and they were monitored 30 days post-surgery for adverse outcomes. Result(s): Out of 100 patients, fifty-seven were frail. Postoperatively, 20% had complications, while 18% expired, with 76% of all adverse outcomes belonging to frail group. FRAIL scale had a significantly better predictive value as compared with Charlson comorbidity index and ACS surgical risk calculator in cases of mortality, but there was no significant difference in predicting morbidity for the three assessment tools. The increase in adverse outcomes compared with previous years was attributed to (1) the proportion of colorectal procedures, and (2) patients were probably in a more advanced stage of illness due to the delays in treatment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion(s): In conclusion, FRAIL scale is an easy-to-use and effective risk assessment tool for geriatric surgical patients. Since most frail patients admit of weakness, resistance training and aerobic exercises may be an appropriate strategy to improve surgical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted maintenance healthcare and elective surgical volume, particularly for benign diseases, including diverticulitis. The study evaluates if the surgical management of diverticulitis was impacted by the pandemic. Method(s): All colectomies for diverticulitis in ACS-NSQIP between 2017-2020 were identified by CPT and ICD codes. Cases were divided into groups by the operation year and quarter variables. The first quarter of 2020 was excluded. The pre- COVID group included cases before 2020 and the post-COVID group included cases after the first quarter of 2020. Associations between groups and baseline demographics and postoperative outcomes were compared. Result(s): 46,839 colectomies were evaluated with 38,860 pre- COVID and 7,979 post-COVID. The groups were similar except for CHF(p=0.027) and ASA classification (p<0.001), which were higher post-COVID. However, pandemic cases were associated with significant markers of disease severity. Pandemic cases were more likely to have preoperative sepsis (p<0.001), wound class 4 (p<0.001), and emergency status (p<0.001). There was no difference in the rates of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or conversion to open among MIS cases. There were also a higher percentage of Hartmann's procedures (p<0.001) post-COVID. However, there was no difference in mortality rates, length of stay, reoperation, open abdomen, readmission, reintubation, or prolonged intubation. There was an association between the pandemic and rates of postoperative pneumonia(p<0.001), ileus (p=0.003), and septic shock (p<0.001). Conclusion(s): During the first year of the pandemic diverticulitis surgeries were performed on sicker patients, more commonly emergencies, and Hartmann's procedures. However, these patients maintained comparable postoperative outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: TBX1 haploinsufficiency is an inborn error of immunity with the phenotype of DiGeorge Syndrome. DiGeorge Syndrome has variable immunodeficiency associated with grade of thymic hypoplasia ranging from mild with no infections to severe requiring thymus implant. Enterovirus is an example of an opportunistic infection that can be fatal in these patients. Case Presentation: A 1 year old girl with TBX1 haploinsufficiency complicated by Tetralogy of Fallot, pulmonary atresia, high arched palate, and vesicovaginal fistula presented for elective cardiac repair surgery from another country due to failure to thrive and cyanosis. She had no prior infectious history but was on sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for prophylaxis. She was asymptomatic with a negative COVID test but no other infectious studies performed. Immediately postoperatively, she was febrile and nasal respiratory viral panel was positive for rhinovirus/enterovirus with increased procalcitonin and leukocytosis with left shift. She decompensated with multi-organ failure and cardiac arrest on postoperative day two. She was cannulated to veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Pre-operatively, she had a normal absolute lymphocyte count. No thymus tissue was observed in surgery. She had profound CD3 lymphopenia to 130 cells/cmm when critically ill. Enteroviral meningitis was suspected as no infectious, cardiac, or other pathology could be identified causing decompensation. Enteroviral serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was negative while lumbar puncture deferred due to clinical status. She was treated with immunoglobulin. Offlabel investigational drug pocapavir was considered but deferred to patient's irreversible neurological status. The patient was disconnected from ECMO and expired. Discussion(s): Though we cannot confirm that this patient had enteroviral meningitis, invasive enteroviral infections are associated with elevated transaminases, coagulopathy, and seizures all present in our patient. There has also been reported negative serum enteroviral PCR but positive CSF enteroviral PCR in an immunodeficient patient. Additionally, this case highlights the importance of immunologic evaluation in patients with DiGeorge Syndrome and questions if asymptomatic viral screening for viruses like enterovirus should be considered pre-operatively in patients with inborn errors of immunity. This case highlights potential treatment options for invasive enteroviral infections in patients with inborn errors of immunity: high dose immunoglobulin, fluoxetine, and pocapavir.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
ABSTRACT
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery, including coronary artery bypass grafting, which has great clinical and economic importance for the healthcare system. Despite the improvement of surgical tactics, anesthetic and care benefits, POAF incidence has been increasing over the past decade. The mechanisms of POAF are different. Chronic coronary artery disease and its frequent comorbidities such as arterial hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus and heart failure, - are associated with various structural and functional changes in the heart, contributing to electrical atrial remodeling. Today, such risk factors for POAF as age, enlarged left atrium, post heart valve surgery, and obesity are well known. A new coronovirus infection that occurred in the early postoperative period can also be a trigger for atrial fibrillation. Postoperative arrhythmias can worsen both hospital and long-term results of treatment, increase the length of the patient's stay in the hospital, and the risk of complications. This review updates the data on the pathogenesis, incidence and complications of POAF, taking into account the current epidemiological situation.Copyright © 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
It is now known that patients with chronic diseases, including those with cancer, are at an increased risk for a severe course of and death from COVID-19. This is due both to systemic immunosuppression caused by the tumor process and to the consequences of antitumor treatment. To provide surgical care to cancer patients during a pandemic is a challenging task. Perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection is accompanied by a high risk for respiratory complications;however, a delay in surgical treatment for ma-ny cancers has a negative impact on cancer prognosis in the patient. Therefore, it becomes apparent that there is a need for strict selection of patients, in whom the benefits of surgical treatment outweigh the potential risk of severe complications;moreover, ways should be developed to provide the safest possible elective surgical care under the existing conditions. The P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center, has not stopped providing care to cancer patients during the pandemic conditions.Copyright © 2021.
ABSTRACT
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had resulted in either failure to provide required medical resources or delayed treatment for gastric cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of postoperative complications using a nationwide Japanese database of patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Method(s): We collected the data of patients who underwent distal gastrectomy from January 2018 to December 2021 from the National Clinical Database (NCD), a web-based surgical registration system in Japan. The number of surgical cases, the use of intensive care units, and the incidence of morbidity per month were analyzed. We also calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), defined as the ratio of the number of observed patients to the expected number of patients calculated using the risk calculator established in the NCD, for several morbidities, including pneumonia, sepsis, 30-day mortality, and surgical mortality. Result(s): A decrease of 568 gastrectomies was observed from April 2020 to May 2020. Although the absolute number of patients admitted to intensive care units had declined since 2020, the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU did not change before and after the pandemic. Mortality and critical morbidity (such as pneumonia and sepsis) rates were not worse during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic periods per the SMR. Conclusion(s): Surgical management was conducted adequately through the organized efforts of the entire surgery department in our country even in a pandemic during which medical resources and staff may have been limited.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a predominantly respiratory infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It creates a hypercoagulable milieu, manifesting at varied extrapulmonary sites as pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, and mesenteric ischemia. The pathophysiology behind this hypercoagulability is still not entirely understood, although a heightened systemic inflammatory response to the virus is deemed responsible. We herein report a case of a 36-year-old healthy male who presented with an acute abdomen and was found to have extensive mesenteric and portal venous thrombosis with bowel gangrene. The patient underwent emergency exploration with ileal resection and end-ileostomy. The hypercoagulability panel was negative, but a postoperative chest radiograph revealed suspicious ground-glass opacities. Given the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic, we considered testing for SARSCoV-2. A positive test for SARS-CoV-2 led us to attribute the thrombotic event to COVID-19. With anticoagulation and supportive therapy, the patient went on to make a steady recovery. A non-specific clinical manifestation of COVID-19 necessitates considering mesenteric venous thrombosis as a differential diagnosis in patients with acute abdomen.Copyright © 2023 Author.
ABSTRACT
Background: Surgical resection remains the mainstay for early breast cancer. However, older patients with multiple co-morbidities may be deemed unsafe for general anaesthesia (GA). The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated some such surgery under local anaesthesia (LA) especially those who lacked anti-hormonal bridging therapy option. We present a retrospective study comparing outcomes following breast conserving surgery (BCS) under LA and GA. Method(s): 31 patients under LA (April 2018-March 2022) were compared with 31 age-matched patients under GA during the same period. Main outcomes were length of hospital stay and rates of margin positivity, re-operation, and post-operative complications within 1 month (including wound infections, seromas needing >=3 aspirations). Statistical analysis (with R-4.2.2) used two-tailed test with significant p-value (<0.05). Result(s): Only 5 LA cases were performed in the 2 years prior to first UK Covid-19 lockdown (March 2020), whilst 26 cases were performed in the 2 years after. [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): The number of BCS cases under LA increased five-fold following Covid-19 pandemic. Outcomes under LA were no worse than under GA. BCS under LA can allow BCS in patients unfit for or unwilling to have GA, especially older patients. Dedicated lists for BCS under LA may reduce need for resources such as hospital beds and overnight stays in the current resource and financially constrained health-care system.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Hospitals are one of the primary resources for disease transmission, so many guidelines were published, and neuro-surgeons were advised to postpone elective spine surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective(s): To avoid pulmonary complications and reduce the risk of spreading the virus and contracting the disease during the COVID-19 era, we operated a group of our patients under spinal anesthesia rather than general anesthesia. Method(s): We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent discectomy surgery for lumbar spinal disc herniation under SA between September 2020 and 2021. Result(s): Sixty-four patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation underwent lumbar discectomy with SA. All patients except three were male. The mean age was 44.52 +/- 7.95 years (28 to 64 years). The mean procedure time for SA was 10 minutes. The duration of the surgery was 40 to 90 minutes per each level of disc herniation. The mean blood loss was 350 cc (200 to 600 cc). The most common involved level was L4/L5 intervertebral disc (n = 40 patients;63.5%). The mean recovery time was 20 minutes. Only three patients requested more analgesics for relief of their pain postoperatively. All patients with discectomy were discharged a day after surgery, and in the case of fusion, two days after surgery. All the patients were followed up for six months, showing no recurrence symptoms, good pain relief, satisfaction with the surgery, and no bad memory of the surgery. Conclusion(s): Spinal anesthesia is a good alternative or even the main anesthesia route for patients with lumbar disc herniation. More studies are needed to elucidate the best candidate for SA in patients with lumbar pathology.Copyright © 2023, Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study: Total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty procedures are recognized as effective treatments for osteoarthritis of the knee and hip joints which are the leading causes of lower extremity disability among older adults. Previous studies have demonstrated a variance in patients electing to undergo these interventions with non-White patients having significantly lower utilization rates. Our study examined if these disparities continued to exist during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Methods Used: This retrospective cohort study included 580 patients who underwent TKA or THA in 2020 and 2021 in a racially diverse region in Washington State. Demographic data, comorbidities, and post-surgical outcomes were recorded. Patients were stratified as those identifying as White (n=490, 84.5%) or Hispanic/ Latino (n=65, 11.2%). Patients identifying with other races (n=25, 4.3%) were excluded from the study due to small sample sizes. Differences between our two groups were examined using a chi-square test for categorical variables and an independent t-test for continuous variables. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Summary of Results: Compared to the White patients, Hispanic/ Latino identifying patients were younger (61.9+/-12.79 years versus 68.58+/-9.00 years;P <0.001), had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (P=0.019), and were more likely to use non-Medicare or Medicaid insurance (P <0.001). No differences were observed in postoperative complication (P=0.632) and COVID-19 infection (P=0.465) rates between the groups. Conclusion(s): Although Hispanic/ Latino identifying patients in this region constitute 45.8% of our study population according to the most recent census tabulation, they accounted for only 11.2% of the patients in our study. These patients were also younger, had fewer comorbidities, and tended to use non-Medicare or Medicaid insurance suggesting an exclusive Hispanic/ Latino patient population electing to undergo TKA or THA procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies controlling for osteoarthritis risk factors and patients' election of treatment options may explain these disparities we have observed.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Rectus sheath hematoma is a rare entity. This report presents a clinical case of a rectus sheath hematoma in a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia and chronic myeloid leukemia, along with a review of the literature. Case Report: A 55-year-old male patient, hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia and chronic myeloid leukemia, presents with tachycardia and hypotension. Computed tomography shows a rectus sheath hematoma. Surgical management was performed to control bleeding and drainage of the hematoma. There were no postoperative complications or need for reoperation. Discussion(s): Hemorrhagic complications in patients with COVID-19 are seldomly reported. Bleeding is a possible complication in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. It is important to take into account rectus sheath hematoma in patients with COVID-19 and/or chronic myeloid leukemia who present with abdominal pain, for early management by a multidisciplinary team. Conclusion(s): Active surveillance and a high index of suspicion are key to identifying potential bleeding complications in patients with COVID-19 and/or chronic myeloid leukemia.Copyright © 2023, Sociedad de Cirujanos de Chile. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 has changed medical practice nowadays. One of the biggest concerns has been establishing when invasive procedures such as surgery, GI endoscopy or bone marrow transplant are safe;and if it is necessary to consider screening for asymptomatic patients. Method(s): We identified asymptomatic patients that were scheduled for invasive procedures from May 2020 to April 2021 at Clinica de Marly. Patients were asked to fill a questionnaire about GI and upper respiratory symptoms and contact with possible/confirmed cases of COVID- 19 in the last 15 days. Patients taken to emergency procedures, who had symptoms or contact with probable/confirmed cases in the last 15 days were excluded. rt-PCR was performed to screen COVID-19. Result(s): A total of 1837 patients were included. 104 rt-PCRs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, leading to a 5.66% of identified asymptomatic patients. Patients were followed-up on the 30th day after the procedure. 1733 negative patients responded to our follow-up, in which only 1 death and 2 complications were detected. 102 positive patients were followed-up and no complications or deaths were reported. Conclusion(s): We found the presence of 5.66% of asymptomatic patients with positive rt-PCR for COVID-19. Safe screening will decide if these invasive interventions can be postponed, or, if the benefit outweighs the risks.Copyright © 2022 Asociacion Colombiana de Infectologia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: Since COVID-19 global pandemic started, increasing importance was given to same-day discharge (SDD) protocols to minimize viral exposure, reducing healthcare costs without compromising patients' safety. While SDD protocols have been applied for robotic radical prostatectomy, literature is still lacking studies evaluating the feasibility of meeting SSD criteria for patients who underwent RASP. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of hospital discharge 24h after surgery. Our secondary endpoint was to assess predictors of successful discharge on 1st postoperative day (POD). Material(s) and Method(s): Patients with allergy to local anesthetics, those scheduled for concomitant surgical procedures and those with severe comorbidities (ASA score 3-4) were excluded from the analysis. Outcomes of this study were: Postoperative Hb drop, 30-day post-surgical readmission, any post-discharge complication, postoperative, time to flatus and consequent regular diet restoration, PSA, flowmetry parameters and validated questionnaires. The SDD criteria included: stable postoperative hemoglobin and vital signs, tolerance of clear liquids, pain control with oral medications and no perioperative complications requiring a prolonged hospitalization (Clavien >1). Result(s): Demographics and baseline values of 63 consecutive patients were reported in Table 1. Perioperative outcomes were shown in table 2. No perioperative complications were reported, median DELTAHb was 2.2 mg/dl, vital signs were stable for every patient. Overall, 55 (87%) patients passed flatus within 24 hours from surgery, and regular diet was restored;7 patients (11%) needed opioids for pain control. Two thirds of patients (n=42, 67%) met the criteria for SDD. At logistic regression analysis, patient's age was the only independent predictor of one night stay (OR 0.89;95% CI 0.80 - 0.98 p=0.02;Table 3). Patients younger than 60 met 24 hours discharge criteria in 90%, while those older than 70 in 50% of cases. Conclusion(s): In a selected cohort of patients with negligible comorbidities profile, discharge within 24h from RASP seems a safe and feasible option in 67% of cases. Patient' age was the only predictor of successful 1 night stay after RASP in our series. [Table presented]Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: There have been numerous techniques used in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) to divide the mesoappendix, including LigaSure, Harmonic scalpel, clips, endoloop ligatures, Endo GIA staplers, and bipolar coagulation. However, few studies have investigated monopolar diathermy for mesoappendix division. Therefore, this study aimed to assess both its safety and efficacy in LA. Method(s): In this prospective non-randomized study, patients (n = 87) who underwent LA for acute appendicitis were included. The bipolar electrocautery was used for mesoappendix division in the first 33 patients (BC group), while the monopolar electrocautery was used in the next 54 patients (MC group). Result(s): The median operative time was significantly shorter in the MC group (42 min. vs 47 min. in BE group, p = 0.01). One patient converted to open surgery in the MC group due to uncontrollable bleeding. There were no significant differences between both groups regarding postoperative complications and hospital stay (p = 0.91, p = 0.13, respectively). Conclusion(s): Monopolar electrocautery is safe and effective for mesoappendix division in LP in comparison to bipolar electrocautery. However, larger and multicentric studies are required to validate our results.Copyright © 2023 The Authors